Ask Patents is a question and answer site for people interested in improving and participating in the patent system. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

My biggest fear is that all the really valuable and very broad patents that qualify as crap have been granted, and we're merely in the midst of the "long tail" of patent applications. How can we fix the problem of the 30,000+ patents that have the potential of ruining startups? Is there a speedy, non-lawyer-required way of killing companies' patents by proving they're obvious or that they already exist?

share|improve this question
up vote 11 down vote accepted

No, there is no way that is quick and inexpensive. Patents are presumed valid and the least difficult way to try to knock one down is an ex parte reexamination. Anyone can file a request based on submitting published documents and an explanation as to how they apply to which claims, and $6000. The patent office gets 3 months to decide if there is a "significant new question of patentablity". If not you get your $6000 back. If so, they proceed to examine it again, but with "special dispatch". At the end a reexamination certificate is issued that might say everything is fine, some claims are changed, some or all claims are gone. The requestor does not get to participate after sending it in.

No lawyer is technically required. You could draw it up yourself, or you can use a registered practitioner. That includes patent attorneys and patent agents. If one were actually spending $6000 in USPTO fees, another few thousand to get it done professionally seems wise.

share|improve this answer

My idea was to create an online system which allows defendants which are accused of patent infringement to find other defendants in the same situation, being sued or threatened to be sued. This would allow several defendants to combine resources and take down some of the patent trolls. Perhaps it could be an addition to this awesome website!

Crowdfunding and crowdresearching patent invalidation suits can really put a dent in the patent trolling industry.

share|improve this answer
Please please launch a kickstarter (or similar) for that and announce it here! – orokusaki Jul 25 '13 at 17:13
LOL....I'm being attacked by a troll so you had best patent your idea! – RJS Sep 18 '13 at 14:06

To add to Mr. White's answer, there is also inter partes reexamination, in which you can actively participate in the process. Cost is higher, and each new submission requires additional fees.

Also, "another few thousand to get it done professionally" is a bit low. :-) I suppose you could find someone to do the filing for cheap, but really, to do it professionally, you're talking five figures, and not necessarily low five figures.

share|improve this answer
Reexam's are handled by senior patent examiners and processed much like the examinations done to grant or reject a patent in the first place. Interpartes reexams were a big step up in complication and legal bills. The AIA replace interpartes reexam with interparty review. They are handled by administrative law judges within the USPTO and are a quasi-litigation. Yes, that is very very expensive in legal bills. – George White Jul 23 '13 at 17:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.