Ask Patents is a question and answer site for people interested in improving and participating in the patent system. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm a researcher doing work in Information Retrieval. One of the papers I stumbled upon was this:

Andrei Z. Broder, David Carmel, Michael Herscovici, Aya Soffer, Jason Y. Zien: Efficient query evaluation using a two-level retrieval process. CIKM 2003: 426-434

which was published in 2003. I also discovered a patent (US7512602) which describes the same idea but was patented only in 2009. The patent contains the same figures as the research paper.

How can the published research paper from 2003 not be considered (or listed in the patent) as prior art to this patent?

share|improve this question

If the paper was published after May 30 2003, the patent application preceded it. The relevant date is not the day the patent is issued, but the day it was applied for. In this case that was in 2006. But it is a continuation of an application filed in May 30 2003. That information appears on the face of the patent under the heading "Related U.S. Application Data". If a patent is filed the day before a journal article is published, that article is not eligible to be considered prior art. It's not prior.

enter image description here

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.