Sign up ×
Ask Patents is a question and answer site for people interested in improving and participating in the patent system. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This application (US13135467) is attempting to patent a broad concept of defining "templates" of graphical objects using natural language text:

Not only is this obvious and not new, but other companies like Microsoft have done this for years. This pHD paper from a Microsoft researcher is from 2006 (the application in question is from 2011) and covers the same idea:

I have submitted a form to USPTO using their "Third-Party Preissuance Submission under 37 CFR 1.290" process but it got rejected because I did not state the "The concise description of relevance is missing or is improper" criteria was not met.

Perhaps someone with more experience filing these forms can help me out? Or, perhaps, even more obvious prior art exists. It would be a shame if this was patented because it seems very general.

share|improve this question

migrated from Jun 3 '14 at 15:33

This question came from our discussion, support, and feature requests site for people interested in improving and participating in the patent system.

I think this belongs on the main Ask Patents site, not on the meta site. I do have a substantive comment/answer if it is reposted or migrated. – George White Mar 5 '14 at 18:20
@GeorgeWhite it was moved. – ryan Jul 10 '14 at 17:04
This patent seems to be reaching for coverage of areas in natural language processing (extracting semantic relations among objects in a natural language) as well as of object-oriented design (though it speaks of "graphical object" everywhere, what is being described are really OO objects: entities with names and attributes that are themselves similar entities.) From NLP to an object structure, to rules which render the implied 3D object. – Kaz Jul 19 '14 at 0:23

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.