The tag has no usage guidance.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

2
votes
1answer
40 views

Arguments allowed in “Concise Description of Relevance” in USPTO prior art filing

During the Third-Party Preissuance Submission under 37 CFR 1.290 one can submit prior art documents together with Concise Description of Relevance explaining relevance of said document. To what level ...
4
votes
1answer
451 views

I had invented and published before this patent application - How do I get it invalidated?

In reference to the patent: PCT/GB2014/051152 WO 2014/170646 A1 granted and pending patents: GB1307148.5, GB1500104.3 and GB1500105.0 to What3Words Limited: Here is the screenshot from the video I ...
0
votes
0answers
13 views

Dates for third party submissions for patents filed between September 16, 2011 and September 16, 2012

My understanding of MPEP 1134.01 is that it may not be possible for third party submissions on US 2014/0019693 A1, due to the following note: Editor Note: This MPEP section is only applicable to ...
1
vote
1answer
116 views

What is the best way to bring a relevant 102 prior art reference to an examiner for a published application?

I found non-patent literature in the form of a letter to the editor correcting a review article. The correction is on point as 102 art for a currently pending published application which is being ...
2
votes
1answer
174 views

Submitting 3rd party prior art - any negative consequences to the 3rd party?

I have some 3rd party prior art available for a handful of published patent applications, by a few large tech corporations. I am knowledgeable in that field so I believe they would bring down a few of ...