Timeline for Can the non-obviousness of an invention be challenged if the difference to prior art is only the mathematical-statistical approach?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:26 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:54 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://patents.stackexchange.com/ with https://patents.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 9, 2012 at 13:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/AskPatents/status/255654547983327233 | ||
| Sep 22, 2012 at 0:59 | answer | added | Julie in Austin | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 20, 2012 at 17:40 | comment | added | Zoe | If the "art" under consideration is the design of processes, then I would suggest examining the "Strategy" pattern of software design: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_pattern. | |
| Sep 20, 2012 at 1:59 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 28, 2012 at 14:50 | |||||
| Sep 19, 2012 at 16:35 | answer | added | user96 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 19, 2012 at 11:27 | history | edited | balpha♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Sep 19, 2012 at 9:25 | history | asked | balpha♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |