Timeline for Do I need to prove a theorem used in my patent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2016 at 20:21 | vote | accept | dan b | ||
| Jan 31, 2016 at 18:31 | history | edited | rhymes_with_dorange | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited summary to be less absolute
|
| Jan 31, 2016 at 15:23 | comment | added | rhymes_with_dorange | @danb, you are correct that, technically, an invention must be useful in order to be patentable. However, this "utility" requirement has taken on a very broad meaning, such that essentially anything can qualify. You will not have any trouble qualifying for a patent based on the utility requirement. | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 10:57 | comment | added | dan b | Doesnt a patent have to be useful? And if i gave an incorrect method wouldn't that mean my patent is not useful | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 5:52 | history | edited | rhymes_with_dorange | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added summary statement
|
| Jan 31, 2016 at 2:02 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 2, 2016 at 19:47 | |||||
| Jan 31, 2016 at 1:57 | history | answered | rhymes_with_dorange | CC BY-SA 3.0 |