Timeline for How do vanishing stories on WhatsApp not infringe Snapchats patents?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 14, 2017 at 2:33 | vote | accept | ahron | ||
Sep 11, 2017 at 14:15 | answer | added | ahron | timeline score: 0 | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 14:03 | comment | added | ahron | @DonQuiKong thanks a lot for looking up the actually granted patent. And that other answer detailing the differences. I'm gonna remember to double check what google spits out. | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 14:01 | comment | added | ahron | @EricShain no problemo. I'm gonna answer it myself probably. Already figured it out from the granted patent. It's really really narrowed down the claim. | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:59 | comment | added | ahron | @EricShain right. Many thanks for that. I'd been following what google popped up when I looked for the patent without looking at if it's an application or grant. | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:58 | comment | added | Eric S | I don't use Snapchat or WhatsApp, so I might have to sit this one out. | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:49 | comment | added | Eric S | @DonQuiKong I was still drinking my morning coffee... | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:47 | history | edited | Eric S | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:46 | history | edited | user18033 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:45 | comment | added | user18033 | @EricShain gotcha, faster ;) | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:44 | comment | added | Eric S | Can you edit your question using the claim from the actual granted patent? Also, you must quote all of the claim! To infringe every step of a claim must be infringed upon, not just a portion. | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:44 | comment | added | user18033 | I edited in the granted claim from the US application. See here for information about the difference between (PCT) applications (what you linked) and granted patents (what eric linked): patents.stackexchange.com/q/17115/18033 | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:43 | history | edited | user18033 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added the first claim from the actually granted US patent
|
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:43 | comment | added | Eric S | Thanks, that is an application. I fixed your link to the actual granted patent. Claims are what is important and the granted patents usually has narrower claims than the application. | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:42 | history | edited | Eric S | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Linked to actual patent.
|
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:37 | comment | added | ahron | I'm not. The patent is already linked to in the first sentence... | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:36 | comment | added | Eric S | Either way, what specific patents are you referring too. If you want help, at least don't make everyone have to do patent searches. | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:34 | comment | added | ahron | Sorry, maybe I misunderstand you. The question is asking about WhatsApp infringing Snapchat patents. | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:32 | comment | added | Eric S | Do you have a specific WhatsApp patent you can reference? | |
Sep 11, 2017 at 13:31 | history | asked | ahron | CC BY-SA 3.0 |