Timeline for Claim dependence on later claim
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2018 at 19:41 | comment | added | Dan Eisenberg | How is it unavoidable? | |
| Apr 20, 2018 at 4:18 | comment | added | Maca | MPEP 608.01(N): "During prosecution, the order of claims may change and be in conflict with the requirement that dependent claims refer to a preceding claim. Accordingly, the numbering of dependent claims and the numbers of preceding claims referred to in dependent claims should be carefully checked when claims are renumbered upon allowance." While it is improper for dependent claims to be out of order initially, it can be unavoidable during prosecution. | |
| Apr 20, 2018 at 2:20 | review | Late answers | |||
| Apr 20, 2018 at 6:05 | |||||
| Apr 20, 2018 at 2:03 | review | First posts | |||
| May 1, 2018 at 13:16 | |||||
| Apr 20, 2018 at 2:02 | history | answered | Dan Eisenberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |