Return to Question

I have 16 years of prior art that would fully invalidate an Apple patent granted in 2019. The Apple patent has two claims (effectively the same claim repeated twice). It has no preferred embodiment. I have had a working and well-publicized application since 2003. (I have a prior-art-to-claims comparison.) From the point of view of remuneration or compensation, how should I proceed?

I have 16 years of prior art that would fully invalidate a patent granted in 2019. The patent has two claims (effectively the same claim repeated twice). It has no preferred embodiment. I have had a working and well-publicized application since 2003. (I have a prior-art-to-claims comparison.) From the point of view of remuneration or compensation, how should I proceed?

I have 16 years of prior art that would fully invalidate an Apple patent granted in 2019. The Apple patent has two claims (effectively the same claim repeated twice). It has no preferred embodiment. I have had a working and well-publicized application since 2003. (I have a prior-art-to-claims comparison.) From the point of view of remuneration or compensation, how should I proceed?

I have 16 years of prior art that would fully invalidate an Apple patent granted in 2019. The Apple patent has two claims (effectively the same claim repeated twice). It has no preferred embodiment. I have had a working and well-publicized application since 2003. (I have a prior-art-to-claims comparison.) From the point of view of remuneration or compensation, how should I proceed?

I have 16 years of prior art that would fully invalidate an Apple patent granted in 2019. The Apple patent has two claims (effectively the same claim repeated twice). It has no preferred embodiment. I have had a working and well-publicized application since 2003. (I have a prior art to claims comparison.) From the point of view of remuneration or compensation, how should I proceed?

I have 16 years of prior art that would fully invalidate an Apple patent granted in 2019. The Apple patent has two claims (effectively the same claim repeated twice). It has no preferred embodiment. I have had a working and well-publicized application since 2003. (I have a prior-art-to-claims comparison.) From the point of view of remuneration or compensation, how should I proceed?