Timeline for Equating claim elements in dependent claims?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2019 at 14:39 | comment | added | AD Adhikary | 2/2. or (ii) "a handheld radio with a body (comprised of electronics/speakers), a handle," ... wherein the handle is a metallic loop covered with insulating material .... . I feel with such enumeration in independent claim, element antenna as handle or element handle as antenna may be corroborated in dependent claim(s). | |
| Nov 6, 2019 at 14:21 | comment | added | AD Adhikary | @user132162. Thanks for those good words. My submission was in layman's language and on the whole in conformity with almost all the answers so far. As regarding post edit opinion, I feel it could be handled in the independent claim itself with a claim structure such as (i) "a handheld radio with a body (comprised of electronics/speakers), an antenna," wherein the antenna is attached to the external part of the body in the shape of a handle ......material and shaped to | |
| Nov 5, 2019 at 13:29 | comment | added | user132162 | I feel like there is a potentially good answer here, but I didn't quite understand. Does the edit above change anything? | |
| Nov 5, 2019 at 3:29 | history | answered | AD Adhikary | CC BY-SA 4.0 |