Timeline for Repeated rejections with new prior art
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2019 at 23:26 | comment | added | Eric S | @KeirFinlow-Bates This is exactly where actual patent attorneys and agents earn their fees. Both in writing rejection resistant claims and arguing their validity. | |
| Dec 4, 2019 at 22:58 | comment | added | George White♦ | In that case your arguments may indeed be knocking down references and the examiner is looking for better references that you can't knock down. | |
| Dec 4, 2019 at 22:34 | comment | added | Keir Finlow-Bates | I'm not adding anything new from the specification to the claims - all I've done is move elements from dependent claims into independent claims, or correct informalities. Some of the "informalities" are things that weren't mentioned prior to RCE, which therefore seem like they were possibly held in reserve in order to ensure that arguments didn't need to be addressed because it gave the opportunity to raise more prior art. | |
| Dec 4, 2019 at 21:47 | history | answered | George White♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |