Timeline for Interpretation of apparatus having specific logic
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2022 at 23:14 | comment | added | George White♦ | Receiving says the core accepts a value it does not say who or what performs an operation transmitting or providing it or otherwise how the value arrives there. So your program putting it in a register or the core retrieving it from memory would all, ultimately, involve the core “accepting” it. Without reading the specification. | |
| Apr 30, 2022 at 23:07 | comment | added | George White♦ | The claims are interpreted in light of the specification and the prosecution history. | |
| Apr 30, 2022 at 20:34 | comment | added | Marko | There's no need to do that, I just wanted to see your opinion based on the claims only. | |
| Apr 30, 2022 at 20:32 | comment | added | George White♦ | If I get a chance I’ll study the patent and its history. | |
| Apr 30, 2022 at 20:30 | history | edited | George White♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
| Apr 30, 2022 at 20:28 | comment | added | Marko | Thank you for the answer. Do you think is it even possible to infringe the method without having the specified apparatus when looking at the whole method's construction even if I could implement the computation steps (but not the receiving step)? | |
| Apr 30, 2022 at 20:23 | history | edited | George White♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
| Apr 30, 2022 at 20:19 | vote | accept | Marko | ||
| Apr 30, 2022 at 18:53 | history | answered | George White♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |