Timeline for ICL_Class from patentpy package to CPC class
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2022 at 23:24 | comment | added | PhD Student | @theEuropeist - Sure, thank you! | |
| Nov 29, 2022 at 23:24 | comment | added | PhD Student | @GeorgeWhite Thanks a lot for the explanations. | |
| Nov 29, 2022 at 19:22 | comment | added | George White♦ | If you follow the link, it is more complicated. "We display the three most pertinent CPC symbols, in decreasing order of relevance. Note that the confidence level of the mapping is low when the number of families statistically processed is small and/or when the statistical dispersion of the mapping of one IPC symbol to many CPC symbols is significant. " | |
| Nov 29, 2022 at 19:11 | vote | accept | PhD Student | ||
| Nov 29, 2022 at 18:21 | comment | added | the Europeist | The biggest problem here is that CPC is like a more detailed version of the IPC with additional subgroups. CPC has most, if not all, the classifications of the IPC, and additional ones. So if you want to have a CPC-equivalent of an IPC, it will probably be the same code. But if you want to have an IPC-equivant of a CPC, it could be that there is none because the IPC lacks the additional subgroup. | |
| Nov 28, 2022 at 21:12 | history | edited | George White♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Nov 28, 2022 at 18:43 | history | answered | George White♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |