Timeline for Patent infringement for patent based vector and the sequence
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2023 at 7:50 | comment | added | ASA | @Eric Actually, there is no patent. I ask this question based on an argument of my colleague. As a new information, same colleague told me that even before use of plasmid, the sequence in plasmid still produces protein however amount of the proteins is very little (below effectivness threshold) so they ignore it's existence but proteins still there. | |
| Feb 14, 2023 at 15:43 | comment | added | Eric S | @ASA Is there a reason you don’t just cite the actual patent? | |
| Feb 13, 2023 at 19:34 | comment | added | George White♦ | I think this changes the question enormously and have edited it into the question. I see this as claiming a DNA sequence that encodes a specific protein. I assume the filing includes a sequence listing. To get a good answer you should add a reference a patent that represents a clear example to the question. | |
| Feb 13, 2023 at 8:08 | comment | added | ASA | After more research, i found below claim structure. "X Vector (plasmid) comprising sequence Y encoding protein Z". Maybe, that one is right way to draft such a claim however i'm not still sure why there is "protein encoded" claims. | |
| Feb 13, 2023 at 8:04 | comment | added | ASA | In case that i tried to explain unsuccesfully, the protein (enzyme) is only generated after the use. There is no protein in method steps or last product. By the way, the claims i tried to understand are product claims. | |
| Feb 13, 2023 at 5:43 | comment | added | George White♦ | not near my field but I image a method claim of the sort would be a method for making Z comprising the steps of (a) provide X (b) provide Y, (c) do things using X and Y resulting in Z. Anything that infringes makes Z at some point. | |
| Feb 13, 2023 at 5:07 | history | answered | Eric S | CC BY-SA 4.0 |