Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
added 243 characters in body
Source Link
George White
  • 30.7k
  • 3
  • 23
  • 57

Let's say claim 1 is not novel and claim 2 is novel and unity objection is posteriori and next independent claim (claim 3) defines a system comprises a device according to any of preceding claims. If I add claim 2 to claim 1,do I have to still delete claim 3?

Ps:I dont want to file divisional and case is for Ep.

Claim 1 is fibre (not novel) and claim 2 is dependent and is about sub feature of fibre (like density of etc) and is novel and claim 3 defines textile product comprise fibre of claim 1 + another feature. Claim 1 and 2 has no unity problem.

Let's say claim 1 is not novel and claim 2 is novel and unity objection is posteriori and next independent claim (claim 3) defines a system comprises a device according to any of preceding claims. If I add claim 2 to claim 1,do I have to still delete claim 3?

Ps:I dont want to file divisional and case is for Ep.

Let's say claim 1 is not novel and claim 2 is novel and unity objection is posteriori and next independent claim (claim 3) defines a system comprises a device according to any of preceding claims. If I add claim 2 to claim 1,do I have to still delete claim 3?

Ps:I dont want to file divisional and case is for Ep.

Claim 1 is fibre (not novel) and claim 2 is dependent and is about sub feature of fibre (like density of etc) and is novel and claim 3 defines textile product comprise fibre of claim 1 + another feature. Claim 1 and 2 has no unity problem.

Source Link
ASA
  • 125
  • 7

Is it possible defend unity objection with amendments

Let's say claim 1 is not novel and claim 2 is novel and unity objection is posteriori and next independent claim (claim 3) defines a system comprises a device according to any of preceding claims. If I add claim 2 to claim 1,do I have to still delete claim 3?

Ps:I dont want to file divisional and case is for Ep.