Skip to main content

Timeline for The techniques here are obvious

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 21, 2013 at 10:23 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/AskPatents/status/304536720152592384
Feb 20, 2013 at 21:10 answer added George White timeline score: 1
Feb 20, 2013 at 19:49 history reopened George White
Robert Cartaino
Feb 20, 2013 at 18:31 review Reopen votes
Feb 20, 2013 at 19:51
Feb 20, 2013 at 18:07 comment added George White This particular patent document is an application. Looking it up in USPTO Public PAIR I see that it has not yet been looked at by an examiner. In its Information a disclosure Statement the inventor has cited 10 earlier U.S. patents and 1 U.S. patent application. Ask Patents is all about helping people located and evaluate prior art documents and understanding the options to bring the to the attention of the USPTO.
Feb 19, 2013 at 2:29 history edited samthebrand
added patent publication number as tag
Feb 18, 2013 at 23:06 comment added user3246 Sorry about that, I tried to tag off the patent itself but the tag didn't exist yet. It happens to be patent appl. 20120321216, but many of the patent applications at faqs.org/patents/assignee/abbyy-software-ltd have the same problem, obviousness and prior art. If I have a question at all, it's how can one register a protest?
Feb 18, 2013 at 17:57 history closed Ron J.
Robert Cartaino
not a real question
Feb 18, 2013 at 17:57 comment added Robert Cartaino Arved: Unfortunately, you haven't provided enough information for us to help you. If you can clarify the question with more information, please 'flag' to reopen. Thanks.
Feb 18, 2013 at 15:37 review Close votes
S Feb 18, 2013 at 17:58
Feb 18, 2013 at 3:57 comment added George White Can you indicate the patent document that you are referencing?
Feb 18, 2013 at 2:18 review First posts
S Feb 18, 2013 at 17:58
Feb 18, 2013 at 2:02 history asked Arved Sandstrom CC BY-SA 3.0