Skip to main content
replaced http://patents.stackexchange.com/ with https://patents.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

For details about what makes good prior art, please see our FAQFAQ. Once you have submitted prior art, check back soon to see if the Ask PatentsAsk Patents community has chosen your prior art to be submitted to the United States Patent & Trademark Office.

If you'd like to contribute in another way, please vote or comment on submissions made below. And we welcome you to post your own request for prior artpost your own request for prior art if you know of another questionable patent or patent application.

For details about what makes good prior art, please see our FAQ. Once you have submitted prior art, check back soon to see if the Ask Patents community has chosen your prior art to be submitted to the United States Patent & Trademark Office.

If you'd like to contribute in another way, please vote or comment on submissions made below. And we welcome you to post your own request for prior art if you know of another questionable patent or patent application.

For details about what makes good prior art, please see our FAQ. Once you have submitted prior art, check back soon to see if the Ask Patents community has chosen your prior art to be submitted to the United States Patent & Trademark Office.

If you'd like to contribute in another way, please vote or comment on submissions made below. And we welcome you to post your own request for prior art if you know of another questionable patent or patent application.

Finished the story about the prosecution history of the application.
Source Link

http://i.imgur.com/7KV3uEI.png

This In 2013, this Patent Application has received a final rejection by the US Patent Office.

An applicant has several ways to keep an application in this state alive. They include a request for continuing examination (RCE), which involves paying more fees and responding to the rejection. Appealing the rejection is another avenue. If nothing is done it will go abandoned six months from the final rejection.

In this application, applicant requested RCE and proposed amendments to the claims. The application received another non-final rejection to which applicant responded with another amendment narrowing the claims further. According to the examiner this placed the application in condition for allowance.

Accordingly, the office issued a notice of allowance and on 01/13/2015 the application was granted US Patent No. 8,933,971.

http://i.imgur.com/7KV3uEI.png

This Patent Application has received a final rejection by the US Patent Office.

An applicant has several ways to keep an application in this state alive. They include a request for continuing examination, which involves paying more fees and responding to the rejection. Appealing the rejection is another avenue. If nothing is done it will go abandoned six months from the final rejection.

In 2013, this Patent Application has received a final rejection by the US Patent Office.

An applicant has several ways to keep an application in this state alive. They include a request for continuing examination (RCE), which involves paying more fees and responding to the rejection. Appealing the rejection is another avenue. If nothing is done it will go abandoned six months from the final rejection.

In this application, applicant requested RCE and proposed amendments to the claims. The application received another non-final rejection to which applicant responded with another amendment narrowing the claims further. According to the examiner this placed the application in condition for allowance.

Accordingly, the office issued a notice of allowance and on 01/13/2015 the application was granted US Patent No. 8,933,971.

added 1 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
edited tags
Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
deleted 7 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
added 227 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
deleted 6 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
deleted 85 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
Correct exaggerated view of the application's state of rejection.
Source Link
George White
  • 30.8k
  • 3
  • 23
  • 57
Loading
added 1 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
edited title
Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
added 1 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
deleted 5 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
added 279 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
edited tags
Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
deleted 1 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
added 77 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
edited tags
Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
added 1 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
edited tags
Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
added 1 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading
deleted 67 characters in body
Source Link
Micah Siegel
  • 3.1k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 45
Loading