Timeline for Updating apps on mobile phone to destroy sensitive data (Good Technologies) - Patent Application - PRIOR ART REQUEST
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
45 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:54 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://patents.stackexchange.com/ with https://patents.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 10, 2014 at 14:34 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Apr 7, 2014 at 22:58 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 231 characters in body
|
| Oct 30, 2013 at 19:18 | answer | added | codeslinger | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 9, 2013 at 3:38 | answer | added | codeslinger | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 6:10 | comment | added | JoeG | Thanks, I'll try to! And thanks for the clarification -- I didn't spot those correspondences. | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 4:12 | comment | added | Micah Siegel | @joeG Reference A and Reference B cited by the Examiner were directly attributable to prior art you found on Ask Patents. Please keep up the great work! | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 4:07 | comment | added | Micah Siegel | Reference A cited by the Examiner, US-2002/0188625 A1, corresponds to US 7,072,913 B2 as described in the Ask Patents answer from 8/24/13; Reference B cited by the Examiner, US-2006/0073820 A1, corresponds to US20060073820 as described in the Ask Patents answer from 8/16/13; Reference C cited by the Examiner, US-2006/0277590 A1, corresponds to US 7,516,478 B2 as described in the Ask Patents answer from 8/14/13 | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 4:04 | comment | added | Micah Siegel | @joeG Looking at the 892 List of References cited by Examiner on 9/9/13... | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 2:46 | comment | added | JoeG | @Micah: Looking at the examiner's rejection, and the list of references he cites, I can't see any indication that his rejection was based on the stackexchange prior art. * portal.uspto.gov/pair/view/… * portal.uspto.gov/pair/view/… ...Where does the stackexchange prior art get cited? | |
| Oct 4, 2013 at 19:06 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 67 characters in body
|
| Sep 27, 2013 at 20:32 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Sep 24, 2013 at 23:48 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Sep 24, 2013 at 22:33 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Sep 24, 2013 at 22:18 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 463 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Sep 17, 2013 at 20:50 | vote | accept | user4545 | ||
| Aug 25, 2013 at 12:52 | answer | added | abickerton | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 15:34 | answer | added | JoeG | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 15:03 | answer | added | JoeG | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 5:41 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 23, 2013 at 21:48 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 22, 2013 at 20:53 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Aug 21, 2013 at 22:25 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2013 at 23:26 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2013 at 15:35 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 19, 2013 at 18:50 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 19, 2013 at 14:11 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 19, 2013 at 6:29 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 19, 2013 at 4:41 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 17, 2013 at 19:33 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 16, 2013 at 21:22 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 16, 2013 at 14:24 | answer | added | JoeG | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 15, 2013 at 1:16 | answer | added | Chromatix | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 14, 2013 at 18:36 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2013 at 14:03 | history | edited | user4545 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified continuation-in-part status and highlighted differences between the invention and well-known prior art.
|
| Aug 14, 2013 at 13:20 | history | edited | Jaydles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2013 at 11:55 | comment | added | Ron J. | The application claims Continuation in Part and a chain of multiple Continuations - the earliest filed Feb. 15, 2008 and published as US 2008/0201453. | |
| Aug 14, 2013 at 2:49 | answer | added | Bruce McLeod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 14, 2013 at 1:34 | answer | added | user5145 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 14, 2013 at 1:14 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Aug 13, 2013 at 23:48 | history | edited | Micah Siegel |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 13, 2013 at 23:03 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Aug 13, 2013 at 21:32 | history | edited | Micah Siegel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Awesome prior art request! Made some modifications.
|
| Aug 13, 2013 at 21:08 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 14, 2013 at 11:55 | |||||
| Aug 13, 2013 at 20:53 | history | asked | user4545 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |