1

The following question is EPC-related:

I duly filed an application without any claims. Date of filing has been accorded under Art. 80, Rule 40. I will receive an invitation to file claims within 2 months, under Rule 58.

  1. What happens if my new set of claims introduces a fresh subject-matter, not disclosed in the originally filed application? Based on which Art./Rule?

Just to compare: by filing missing parts, Rule 56 (does not apply to claims), the whole application gets re-dated.

Will it lead to an added subject-matter problem under Art. 123(2)? Will the date of filing of the whole application re-dated? Will the claims with old/new subject-matter have different effective date?

  1. What happens if a newly filed application claims priority from the old/new subject-matter of the first application? Based on which Art./Rule?

1 Answer 1

1

not sure if I got your question right, but here are my thoughts:

  1. Claims must be supported by the description, hence it is not allowed to introduce new subject matter, GL. F-iv.6.1. However, claims are generalisations of the embodiments in the description, which could potentially introduce new subject matter, in that case you could run into a Art. 123(2) problem, GL. F-iv.6.2.

  2. If your newly filed application contains subject matter that is not disclosed in the filing you are claiming priority for, then the priority simply doesn't hold.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .