Is providing "search services" (like patent search, patent landscape, freedom to operate analysis and so on) reserved to patent agents or patent attorneys or is it a service that any company can provide?

Is searcher accountable if she makes a mistake? Is it legal for searcher to provide service with a Limitation and Exclusion of Liability clause?


Searching is a highly debated process, and a lot of patent professionals will argue that you shouldn't do a search, or that you have to. I know that's not your question, but it's an important piece of the answer.

The short answers to your questions are: any company can provide a searching service, maybe, and yes.

Ultimately, the entirety of the burden falls on the filer, or filing attorney.

The standards for searching are pretty straight-forward:

  • You don't have to do a search.
  • If you do a search and find something, you have to tell the patent office.
  • If you submit too much, you can get in trouble for trying to hide relevant parts.

Anyone can do a search. I could do a search right now, just using some search engine. You don't have to be a patent professional to do that. People who know how to search often are professionals, but there's no requirement there.

Beyond that, the liability comes only through your contract with the provider. The USPTO is holding you accountable for what you give them, so if you fail to disclose something you find, that's on you, and not on the searcher. However, of course, if they're giving some sort of guarantee on their searches, you could then hold them liable for not pulling through.

To avoid that, yes, they could offer a contract that reduces their liability.

| improve this answer | |
  • How much of submitted prior art is "too much", to get me in trouble for trying to hide relevant parts? – Pol99 Jan 20 '15 at 21:50
  • @Pol99 That's a pretty rare case, and it's only really relevant if you're submitting things that aren't relevant to the application. The issue there, of course, is that there can be some subjectivity in what is and is not relevant, but as long as you're thoughtful about what you submit, it shouldn't be an issue. Basically, don't do a google search for "chair" when you've got an improvement on a chair, and submit everything that comes back. It's also best not to be too redundant--once you've shown that something is prior art, you don't have to prove it three-fold. – Matthew Haugen Jan 20 '15 at 22:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.