Company A obtained a design patent(unpublished)in 1990 which was granted and enforce. Company B during the enforcement period of 1995, decided to apply for a utility patent, using the methods of reconstructing the design, now both A and B designs are for a article of manufacturing and both have similarities in design. Company B after extensive prosecution was able to obtain a utility patent for their invention design in 1998. Company A design patent expired in 2003 (14 years Period), which is now become public domain. Company C wanted to manufacture Company A design, not knowing that Comp B used the design for their invention. Comp. B filed suit against Comp. C in federal court, allegations of infringement. Can B successfully sued C for a design patent which is public domain and why are Patent Designs not Published.

  • This is just a prime examples, don't want a burst anyone bubbles. You know this can and will happen – meta9 Mar 30 '15 at 22:05
  • If C utilizes the same method/process as claimed by the utility patent, and if B can prove that, B can file a suit against C. C will likely obtain an expert opinion challenging the validity of the utility by arguing that the method/process is obvious in light of the design patent. It's very likely B and C will settle before the case ever goes to the court, or engage in a lengthy litigation before someone calls quit and both parties settle out of court anyway. – daniel Feb 24 '16 at 3:00
  • Company B's utility patent filed in 1995 probably expired in 2015. Did company C start manufacturing before then? – Eric S Feb 18 '17 at 15:49
  • @daniel Your comment is actually a good answer (better, I think then the only one provided). Perhaps you should submit it as an answer. – Eric S Feb 18 '17 at 15:51

One, granted design patents are published. Design patents and utility patents cover different aspects of a product. Design patents cover the ornamental features of a product, not the function of a product. For example, the design patent was for an airplane and B made an actual airplane that looked like the drawings in the published design patent. If B gets one or more utility patents on aspects of the plane then C could certainly build an airplane that infringes on B's patents.

It is possible, but unlikely, that A's design patent constituted enabled prior art to the claims B was granted. In that case, C might be able to get the patent invalidated in an IPR proceeding.


In 1990, patent applications were not published until they were granted. If they actually obtained a design patent, it should have been published as a patent grant. Certain granted patents are not published, but that is a very narrow category (basically national security). If you provide some of the patent numbers, you will probably get much better answers.

  • This does little to answer the question which relates to companies B and C not company A. – Eric S Feb 18 '17 at 15:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.