3

In reference to the patent: US 8,384,613

What one has to do, if this patent is not new and just gives the same idea patented in 1990?

I would be grateful on an answer.

  • Do you know the publication number for your patent? – Matthew Haugen Apr 24 '15 at 5:38
2

Any claim that covers embodiments rendered obvious by the description of the previous patent is invalid.

At first glance it appears that the newer patent adds a lot of constraints to the structure; these additional constraints might not be obvious even if the purpose of the invention is the same.

Just because a car has already been patented doesn't mean you can't patent a car. You can still patent a car that has specifics to it that are not rendered obvious by any previously described car. You just can't patent a car at the same level of generality anymore.

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.