I am looking to launch a product which has already existed in Australia but failed to make any money at the time. The product was created around 3 years ago but the company seems to have ceased trading now. There is no patent or patent-pending on the product.

It's a utility patent. What would be classed as published material. They have a Facebook page with the product, but no updates on the page since 2013.

Can I still apply for a patent on the idea?


When filing an application, you must complete a declaration, which states:

. . . I believe that I am the original inventor or an original joint inventor of a claimed invention in the application. I hereby acknowledge that any willful false statement made in this declaration is punishable under 18 U.S.C. 1001 by fine or imprisonment of not more than five (5) years, or both. . .

Also, from 37 C.F.R. 1.56(a):

Each individual associated with the filing and prosecution of a patent application has a duty of candor and good faith in dealing with the Office, which includes a duty to disclose to the Office all information known to that individual to be material to patentability as defined in this section.

So no, you cannot apply for a patent for something invented by someone else or publicly available more than a year prior to your application.


I'm going to look at this from a completely different perspective, which is why did this product fail, and what have you modified ("invented" ...) which ensures it won't be a failure the second time around.

First things first - if you have no expectation that you'll significantly improve the product, you have no realistic reason to believe it will be a success this time around. Which pretty much means you need to figure out how to make it work.

The good news is that a novel and non-obvious improvement to a patentable "thing" is itself patentable. Assuming you are the inventor of this improvement, you can file for a patent.

You will need to disclose the original "thing" and your independent claim(s) will need to disclose your improvement.

All that said, if you've not improved, in a novel and non-obvious fashion, the original "thing" you have no invention and nothing to patent.


I think you can. Because no one has patented it before and there is no patent-pending on the product. So I believe the answer is yes. I recommend you get some advice from the patent institution. By the way, it's days after you first made this question, have you made the decision?

  • No. A patent is for things that are novel (new) and invented by the inventor listed in the application. The item is not new and it wasn't invented by the OP.
    – George White
    May 27 '17 at 18:55
  • 1
    Quite simply, this answer is wrong.
    – Eric S
    Jul 13 '17 at 15:21
  • A "patent" isn't a thing you get like a claim to an unused gold mine -- that is, if no one is working a "gold mine", the government might let you, but that's not what patents are. A patent is a recognition that you came up with some new, non-obvious and useful "thing", and in exchange for teaching others how to do that "thing", you get a monopoly on the "thing". Nov 21 '18 at 18:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.