Lets say John has an invention and he wants to file patent for it. He wants to write everything in a single patent with the obvious motivation of saving money. However, he could potentially break his inventions into multiple sub-components and file multiple shorter patents, but he is unsure whether there is any advantage of doing this. What are the pros and cons for both options?

Assuming John is in the US.

  • Just a note, but the patent office may require you to split the patent up if it feels there is more than one invention contained in it. This happened to me. This was quite annoying since the most value was contained in the combination of the two ideas that were split. I ended up needing three patents. – Eric Shain Sep 18 '16 at 17:25
  • @EricShain that's interesting, so maybe John should just try to file a single one and let the patent office decide whether to break it up? – user3667089 Sep 19 '16 at 0:02
  • Better to concentrate on what John exactly wants to claim. If the application claim dissimilar embodiment, the examiner will ask for a split. John can then pay $ and change the claim, or pay $$ and argue with the examiner. In either case, examination get delayed. I can think of other cons but can't think of any pro. – daniel Sep 19 '16 at 3:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.