Consider a patent licensee. It is quite possible that the expected royalty payments, cost of challenge (post grant, inter partes, or ex parte reexam), and probability of invalidation would justify a validity challenge (i.e. expected value >$0). For example, if the expected lifetime royalties may amount to a few million, the cost of a challenge was $100k, and the probability of invalidation may be 20%, it would probably make sense to challenge.

Is this done in practice? Are there traditional license terms that forbid this? Does the challenging licensee lose credibility in the case given that they were concerned enough to sign a license in the first place?

I have read that validity challenges are usually initiated by those being sued for infringement, but it seems like a valid action for a licensee as well.

closed as off-topic by Robert Cartaino Jul 28 '17 at 12:20

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Copyright, Trademark, and Licensing Issues Are Off Topic — Ask Patents is a community-run website to ask about the patent process or to help find Prior Art on US Patents or Applications. Unfortunately, questions about copyright, trademark, and licensing issues are outside the scope of this site. Sorry about the confusion." – Robert Cartaino
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • “Are there traditional license terms that forbid this?“ afaik licenses seldom expire if the patent falls. – DonQuiKong Jul 28 '17 at 6:32
  • I fear this is unanswerable, since generally licensing terms are not made public. And licensing is off topic in any case. But in my experience, there is wide variation in how this dealt with, so that there really is no traditional approach of note. – Maca Jul 28 '17 at 8:03
  • 1
    By way of randomly picked anecdotes, Harvard's example licence contains a provision at 4.4.2 for doubling royalties fees if a patent is challenged and the University of Rochester provides at 16.2 that the licensee will keep paying even while challenging, but doesn't disallow it. – Maca Jul 28 '17 at 8:03
  • @DonQuiKong Although I don't have the reference on hand, I believe the courts have ruled in the past that if the patent is invalid, royalties are no longer due. However, if know-how was licensed, then those royalties can persist. – user132162 Jul 28 '17 at 13:27
  • @Maca Okay, good to know – user132162 Jul 28 '17 at 13:29