-1

I have 100s of inventions on paper in short hand. I have improvements on the rubber glove to improvements on the electric generator. I do not know how to pick a winner and go with that one first? Should I go with the cheapest to make first?

closed as primarily opinion-based by Robert Cartaino Apr 1 '18 at 22:19

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • The question is related to i. how to determine patentability and ii. what is the cheapest alternative for obtaining a patent? – AD Adhikary Apr 2 '18 at 1:21
3

Consider what, if patented, would really bring you commercial value.

If you're never going to actually make and sell the patented device, then what's the point of applying for a patent? For example, are you really going to make and sell an electric generator?

The exception is if you want to be a non-practising entity. You can then sell your patented improvement to others, or sue others when they independently implement it. The former is very rare (except perhaps in pharmaceuticals and telecommunications). The latter is somewhat more common, but depends on whether you want a livelihood built on shaking down legitimate businesses.

Moreover, consider why you want a patent at all. If you haven't commercialised any of your ideas already, then perhaps a lack of a patent isn't the underlying issue. A business without a patent is better than no business with a patent.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.