A. Meaning : In the simplest of terms - Broadest Reasonable Interpretation of Claims means, to interpret what the claim(s), in other words the invention is directed and related to.
B. Example :
i. One can obtain some US patent nos or application nos at random from google patents or other sources and look for them in Public Pair https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair file wrapper.
ii. Look for non-final or final rejection communication of office. A few might have faced 35 USC 101 rejection. The first paragraph invariably reads 'the claims are directed to ......' . That is the broadest reasonable interpretation (by the examiner and applicant may differ from him).
iii. Hence, no generally accepted thought process as such but procedural guideline is there. May refer https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2111.html
C. Flowchart : BRIoC encompasses all claims interpreted in the light of specification and plain meanings of the words of the claims and determines what the claims are directed to. If disclosure and claims are directed to different
inventions (i.e. claims not cohesively related) than those are to be in separate applications (if not done by applicant, examiner will direct for division).
D. Individual Claims : These are for scope of protection and for consideration under steps 1, 2A and 2B of Mayo test flow chart.