I've found an allowed continuation to a parent patent application, in which the continuation contains a single claim that appears to be one long concatenation of the original 20 claims of the parent application.

Why would a corporation file such a continuation?

Here is a link to the continuation: US Patent Application 20180227119 (continuation)
And here is a link to the patent: US Patent Application 20180227119 (patent)

  • Could you provide the two patent numbers? – Eric S Aug 17 '18 at 13:59
  • 15/851879 which is a continuation of 15/429121 – Keir Finlow-Bates Aug 17 '18 at 14:41
  • Embedding links in your question makes it much more convenient for people to answer your question. – Eric S Aug 17 '18 at 14:44
  • I didn't think the actual two applications were relevant. The later has one claim, which is the 20 claims of the parent combined into a single claim. Presumably there was a reason to do this, that is unrelated to the actual content of the patent applications, and there is some general principle or intention at play. But I will update the question to include the links. – Keir Finlow-Bates Aug 17 '18 at 15:27
  • This might come down to guessing. – DonQuiKong Aug 17 '18 at 22:40

They did it to get one narrow patent issued early while continuing to fight for a broader patent. The continuation application (15/851,879) was filed with the narrowest claim and filed with an optional costly process that provides accelerated examination. IBM got a notice of allowance on the continuation but the parent (15/429,121) application is still pending. To follow the details on a pending patent application use the USPTO's Public PAIR.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.