In claims, is there any distinction between the phrases "one or more of" and "at least one of"? If "a plurality of" has already been used in the Claim 1 initial statement (e.g., "at least one of a plurality of"), in combination with one of those first phrases, can the "plurality" phrase be dropped in subsequent claims? (Let's assume in this case that there's a specific reason why "plurality" needs to be mentioned. In other words, the field of possible options from which "one" needs to apply is in fact, necessarily, a plurality.)
Added: To hopefully better clarify the question, consider this part of a claim:
displaying in the graphical user interface *at least one of a plurality* of source content...
then in a later clause,
...displaying *the at least one* source content as a selectable entity...
The questions are:
- In the first case of "at least one" and the second case "the at least one," would substituting "one or more" make any logical difference, or otherwise be preferable for clarity?
The phrase "a source content" has been introduced in the first part, along with the use of "a plurality of." In every subsequent mention of the phrase such as in the second part, should "a plurality of" be repeated? (example, revised version of 2nd part):
...displaying the at least one of a plurality of source content as a selectable entity...