As in the title, if an examiner rejects claims 1 and 2, with claim 2 being dependent on claim 1, would amending only claim 1 be fully responsive to the office action?

For example,

Claim 1: A Z comprising of Y | Rejected for being anticipated Z comprised of Y.

Claim 2: A Z according to claim 1, further comprising X | Rejected for being anticipated Z comprised of Y and X.

Would amending claim 1 to read: "A Z comprising of Y and W" be sufficient to respond to the office action?

bumped to the homepage by Community 2 days ago

This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.


Yes, claim 2 is dependent on claim 1 meaning it contains all limitations of claim 1 and was therefore also amended by W.

  • 2
    But do not use the claim status "currently amended" on a dependent claim unless the text of that claim is being altered. – George White Jul 16 at 22:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.