The claim 2 has a list of means that apply to "the object" but it may be misconstrued that the last element in the list is not "intercepting" but rather "intercepting the object" in which case the other means would not apply to anything.
A method for decelerating an object, the method comprising: limiting a speed and/or position of the object; enabling deceleration controls.
The method of claim 1, further comprising: enforcing a speed limit resulting from the limiting, wherein the enforcing comprises at least one of: breaking, capturing, "intercepting" the object.
Can this claim be written in a better format?
Perhaps a semicolon after the "intercepting" would be a good separator?