0

"Genetically Modified Cannabis Sativa Plants And Modified Cannabinoid Compounds For Treatment Of Substance Addiction And Other Disorders"

This is absurdly general. It would be the same like patenting an "antibiotic" agent for the purpose of killing bacteria, without pointing out a specific and NOVEL mechanism.

How can you patent a gene? it is naturally made!

  • A link to the actual document you are referring to is greatly appreciated. You want to make it easy for others to answer your question. – Eric S May 3 at 14:40
  • Sounds like the title not the claims .... – DonQuiKong May 5 at 18:30
1

This question appears to be about patent application US20200061138A1. Within US patent law, there are two relevant questions. First, the question of whether the US patent system allows this type of thing to be patented, also called patent-eligible subject matter. Second, whether the claims are directed to something new and not obvious, also called an inventive step.

US20200061138A1 has two main claims. Claim 1 is directed to a method for increasing cannabinoids in a genetically modified Cannabis sativa, performed by over-expressing certain enzymes in the plant. Claim 10 is directed to a chemical compound, most commonly known as CBD or cannabidiol. I will discuss the patentability of the genetically modified plant separately from the chemical compound.

Plants in general, and genetically modified plants in particular, are patent-eligible subject matter. See the USPTO's manual chapter 2105 (https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2105.html).

Moving on, claim 10 is directed to the chemical 2-((1R,5R)-3-methyl-5-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclopent-2-en-1-yl)-5-pentyl benzene-1,3-diol (paragraph 0030). This is also known as cannabidiol, CBD, and under the trade name Epidiolex. Chemical compounds are patent eligible subject matter. Claim 10 is directed to a chemical compound that is well known (cannabidiol, CBD, Epidiolex). Accordingly, it is not new.

Finally, claims 14, 15, 19 and 20 are directed to broad methods of administering mixtures containing CBD for treating broad classes of disease. The USPTO has issued at least one patent (US9474726B2) for using CBD to treat a different disease (epilepsy; this was approved by the FDA under the trade name Epidiolex). These methods to treat disease are also patent-eligible.

As regards whether or not the claimed subject matter is new and not obvious, we can wait to see what the USPTO after review. The Applicant did cite previously known methods for genetically modifying plants (paragraphs 0025, see also paragraphs 0026-0029). Furthermore, the Applicant provided a motivation to increase these enzymes in Cannabis, in order to have higher concentrations of the active cannabinoids (paragraph 0012).

I hope this helps.

| improve this answer | |
  • Nice answer. It’s good to have a new contributor. Welcome. – Eric S May 2 at 22:01
0

This US20200061138A1 is currently an application, not a granted patent. If you are judging the breadth of a patent application or patent by its title you are making a big mistake. Patent breath is determined by the claims that are usually narrowed during prosecution. The first claim in the application starts -

. . . genetically modifying the Cannabis sativa plant with a genetic modification, wherein the genetic modification induces the Cannabis sativa plant to overexpress a gene controlling the expression of a . . .

Genetically modifying something of natural origin is not the same as something of natural origin.

Completely separately there is something called a plant patent. It applies to plants that have been created by grafting, for example, not by direct genetic manipulation.

| improve this answer | |
  • You might want to mention the fact that you can even patent plants. – Eric S May 2 at 4:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.