1

Can I use two alternative element without broder statement without covers both? (In one independent claim) (In EPO application)

In example, X comprising (A or B) and C (it is an independent apparatus claim)

Further question,

X comprising (A or B) and C wherein "C is configured for Y if invention comprising A" or "C is configured for Z if invention comprising B"

P.S: Combination of A and B and C provides very similar techical effect for both alternatives. P.S: I cant use broder term covers both A and B

Thank you all.

3

Claims are hard to draft and your approach might not be artful but alternatives are allowed in EPO claims if they don't get too confusing.

A claim, whether independent or dependent, may refer to alternatives, provided that the number and presentation of alternatives in a single claim does not make the claim obscure or difficult to construe and provided that the claim meets the requirements of unity (see also F-V, 3.2.1 and 3.2). In the case of a claim defining (chemical or non-chemical) alternatives, i.e. a so-called "Markush grouping", unity of invention is considered to be present if the alternatives are of a similar nature and can fairly be substituted for one another (see F-V, 3.2.5).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.