A US patent issued having a "summary of invention" NOT covering the claims (e.g. describing different materials).

Is it valid?


A "summary of the invention" section is not a hard requirement of a patent application. During prosecution claims get amended and in a follow-on application the claims might be directed to some aspect that is covered but not focused on in the initial application. The specification is usually not amended in order to avoid a concern over introducing "new matter" so the claims and the summary end up out of sync. The more important issue is whether the application as filed, as a whole, suficently supports the claims.

On the other hand, if a summary sections says "my invention is a ", some judges will use that to further narrow their interpretation of the claims to a . That is one reason some people are leaving off summary sections altogether.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.