Questions tagged [novelty]

For questions relating to "novelty," as related to patents. Specifically, the bar for novelty in patents and patent applications, and interpretations thereof.

14 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
0 answers
75 views

This patent looks to be a spam/troll attempt

In reference to the patent: US20100313926 I'm an electrical engineering major that just graduated with my masters degree. I was looking at zeolite applications and I stumbled onto this patent. After ...
Joseph's user avatar
  • 21
2 votes
0 answers
81 views

Can this patent be rejected?

I have an Indian (utility) patent pending (filed in November 2014) for a process related to improved aircraft engine type/class. I am thinking of filing a PCT International application for the same (...
Swapnil Jagtap's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
49 views

prior art for US 20150079942

In reference to the patent: US20150079942 I am looking for prior art for US patent application 20150079942. I believe this invention has overly broad claims. According to me invention has not at ...
Daniel's user avatar
  • 21
1 vote
0 answers
38 views

When would a reference listed on the patent not be considered for determination of prior art?

In a US patent (re)examination, under what circumstances would a reference not be considered for the determination of prior art, when that reference is cited by the examiner, appears on the front page ...
fgrieu's user avatar
  • 133
1 vote
0 answers
50 views

Is US8433843 invalid?

In reference to the patent: US8433843 I'm convinced this patent is invalid. This patent, in summary, is: The idea of combining wear leveling with a secure erase in the write step. Various claims ...
rnpl's user avatar
  • 11
1 vote
0 answers
140 views

Patent has multiple prior art, why is the multiple prior art not preventing the grant of it?

In reference to the patent: US8470388 COUNTRY - Patent Number United States - 8470388 Australia - 2013207081 Austria - EP2801242 China - CN104115561B Czech Republic - EP2801242 EPO - EP2801242 France ...
user19473's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
139 views

Seems like overwhelming prior art and lack of novelty, could this actually get patented?

In reference to the patent: US20140207263 I ran across this patent application in a google search and can't help but be dismayed that someone is actually trying to patent this. Is this a patent troll?...
user17159's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
40 views

Is a less restrictive rule different or a subset of a more restrictive rule?

A patent application for a software system, or a set of rules basically, is facing potential prior art challenge. The prior art invention has 5 elements/rules: 1. Rule_A 2. Rule_B 3. If and when A ...
Bear Bile Farming is Torture's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
32 views

A claim that is more general than one in prior art

Supposed that in prior art, this claim exists: Triangular shaped object Circular shaped object Square shaped object Would the following claim be allowed: Triangular shaped object Circular shaped ...
Bear Bile Farming is Torture's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
144 views

'Novelty only' prior art

Can someone explain to me the meaning of novelty only prior art, and the difference between this and regular prior art? Thanks.
Laurence Dawkins's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
69 views

Existing Patent's Application Usages

I have an idea which is very close to an existing patent CN 103839021 A. However, its application and working is completely different than what is mentioned in that patent. I came across the section ...
DinoMyte's user avatar
  • 101
0 votes
2 answers
28 views

How is the system described novel in any way? It is simply a proxy registration that has been digitzed.

In reference to the patent: US7130878
Tariq's user avatar
  • 1
-1 votes
1 answer
133 views

Broad application applies to longstanding software capability

In reference to the patent: US20150058243 This application is overly broad and would presume to cover long standing job search and matching capabilities used by large providers such as Monster.com; ...
LaTrent Burdette's user avatar
-2 votes
2 answers
61 views

patent conflicts

In reference to the patent: WO2015130230A1 Does this patent conflict with the following patents: “一种在水体中原位取样、分离、富集、测量水体污染物的方法” with Nos. CN101021514 B, CN200710010550.1, CN200710010553.5,and ...
realtime's user avatar