Skip to main content

Questions tagged [obviousness]

The tag has no usage guidance.

2 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
0 answers

The patent claim one benefit of purification and then try to over reach. Nothing new

In reference to the patent: US20140093916 What is new about it? it is just the same as other protein based affinity purification.
user14275's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers

Overcoming obviousness-type double patenting rejection referencing third-party material

I have a provisional OTDP rejection that references an earlier application I made, explicitly references a third-party reference (no inventors in common with the application), and two other references ...
Keir Finlow-Bates's user avatar