Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
1
vote
Broader claim for a Provisional application after non-provisional application - same invention
Update: Turns out there was an earlier provisional, so this answer no longer applies. I've left it for posterity.
Because the first non-provisional was filed less than a year ago, a simple approach …
1
vote
Format of Continuation-In-Part Specification and Claims
By way of preface, I note that this answer only really applies to the US. No other country has continuations-in-part, and most countries don't allow incorporation by reference.
I would suggest that y …
4
votes
Accepted
Adding useful and unobvious functionality to existing patent
Would Bob need to obtain permission from Alice to use her patent?
Yes, in the countries that Alice has a patent, Bob would need to obtain a licence before he could manufacture and sell his produc …
2
votes
Accepted
Risks of splitting invention into multiple patents?
This is opinion, as I'm not aware of any empirical way to measure this.
I would suggest that scenario B should always be used.
Assuming you have two separable inventions, then it makes sense that yo …