Repeating claims in a CIP that are identical to those in the parent application or granted parent patent
In an independent claim is there any advantage of stating all the critical antecedents up front rather than introducing them individually?
Stating a specific class of computing device, such as touchscreen devices, in the first independent claim
Is a singular word spelling a different word than a plural spelling, therefore screwing up antecedent flow?
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible