Skip to main content
4 votes
Accepted

Repeating claims in a CIP that are identical to those in the parent application or granted parent patent

You include the claims you haven't yet claimed and want to claim. You can't have the same claim word-for-word in more than one patent. It would be double patenting. If you didn't care about making ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
4 votes
Accepted

Adding useful and unobvious functionality to existing patent

Would Bob need to obtain permission from Alice to use her patent? Yes, in the countries that Alice has a patent, Bob would need to obtain a licence before he could manufacture and sell his product. ...
Maca's user avatar
  • 6,188
3 votes
Accepted

Do terminal disclaimers (TDs) inherit estoppel/disclaimers from TD "family"?

"Disparaging" prior art does not automatically disclaim scope. Previously it was good practice to characterize prior art for its strengths and weaknesses - particularly weaknesses. Then some judges ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
2 votes
Accepted

Risks of splitting invention into multiple patents?

This is opinion, as I'm not aware of any empirical way to measure this. I would suggest that scenario B should always be used. Assuming you have two separable inventions, then it makes sense that ...
Maca's user avatar
  • 6,188
2 votes

Does a CIP IDS require a copy of the parent US application?

The IDS does not need to list any U.S. applications that are claimed as priority applications. It should list everything listed on the IDSs on all previous applications or cited against them. You do ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
2 votes
Accepted

Will a request for expedited examination of a CIP force an office action on a languishing parent application?

Making B or C special due to age will not change the course of A at all. If there are a few claims in A that you would really like examined quickly you could include them in an expedited B (if a CIP) ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
2 votes
Accepted

Can I bring the content from parent provisional application to a continuation?

Since the provisional was incorporated by reference, you can amend in any material from it that you like. And a continuation that only has material from the provisional + the parent will not need to ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
2 votes
Accepted

When exactly your own disclosures will be used as prior art against you?

There are no continuations in part at the EPO. At the EPO you only have patent applications, and divisionals of patent applications. Divisionals have the same disclosure of the parent application or a ...
the Europeist's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Effects on continuation-in-part of now-abandoned patent

USD621102 is a granted design patent. The abandoned parent application was a utility patent application. The abandonment of the parent is not, Itself, relevant to the child CIP. Design patents are ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
2 votes
Accepted

What does the name "continuation in part" mean?

It has two parts: one part is fully supported by the parent and a second part that is new matter. Not fully, but In part it’s a continuation.
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
1 vote

Claiming priority in EPO from a US Continuation/CIP Patent Applicaiton?

No, the Paris Convention is clear that the priority claim must be based on the first-filed application on the subject matter. Almost no other locations even have plain continuations and CIPs are ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
1 vote

Can I restore material from a parent application deleted in an intervening CIP and not lose the parent’s priority?

Yes Since the content you need is in an application that is pending the new application can get the info directly, there is no intervening application. Just claim priority to the parent and forget the ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
1 vote

Co-inventorship when claims based on the contributing inventor's concepts are dropped during prosecution

It isn’t moot - it would be positively improper to add them. In the U.S. an inventor is someone who makes a conceptual contribution to something in a claim. Someone might be an inventor in a ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
1 vote

Describing your own prior art in specs for a CIP

Explaining the new applications relationship to a previous application of yours is much more likely to hurt than help. It would be cited in the first sentence of the application as "The current ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
1 vote

Docket numbers of CIPs with electronic filing

A docket number is just a way for someone who files many many applications to refer to them in their own database. Some practitioners might use the number if the parent with “-CIP” appended. A ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
1 vote
Accepted

Can a CIP claim priority to a provisional application filed after the parent non-provisional?

Yes I suggest - "This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application ZZ/YYYYY filed on ZZ/Z/ZZZZ and claims the benefit of provisional application XX/YYYYY filed on XX/X/XXXX."
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
1 vote
Accepted

Continuation in part to overcome concerns of undue experimentation

Yes - Whether a CIP or a straight continuation, you can add the new material BUT in both cases you effectively loose the original priority date. A way to have your cake and eat it too would be to ...
George White's user avatar
  • 29.2k
1 vote

Format of Continuation-In-Part Specification and Claims

By way of preface, I note that this answer only really applies to the US. No other country has continuations-in-part, and most countries don't allow incorporation by reference. I would suggest that ...
Maca's user avatar
  • 6,188
1 vote
Accepted

Broader claim for a Provisional application after non-provisional application - same invention

It's been awhile since I did this, but IIRC (if I recall correctly ), one may file a CIP at any time during pendency of the original non-provisional and its descendents, which is the only way to "add ...
Upnorth's user avatar
  • 271
1 vote

Broader claim for a Provisional application after non-provisional application - same invention

Update: Turns out there was an earlier provisional, so this answer no longer applies. I've left it for posterity. Because the first non-provisional was filed less than a year ago, a simple approach ...
Maca's user avatar
  • 6,188

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible